Family Medicine 7501 S. Riverside Pkwy, Tulsa, Ok

You know about how individuals gain control of the power of the State and and so abuse that ability like one-time US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush United kingdom The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley xv Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported by Britain Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not exist only which Blair claimed could be deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If y'all think that and so yous will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can salvage us all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously virtually how unscientific the merits is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came near every bit a event of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, peculiarly diet and sanitation. The effect cannot exist attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself non to have:

Pocket-size Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty illness called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was specially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading illness: London's first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would continue them safe from the threat of illness.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the illness controlled.  The problem was this was a myth merely the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed every bit many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

At present y'all can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- Britain, United states of america & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells u.s.a.. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatever scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the turn down in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox decease rates plummeted [meet table below].  Leicester's approach too price far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Catamenia.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (Uk)	1860-1908	1,355	96	vii.1
British Army (Bharat)	1860-1908	2,753	307	eleven.i
British Regular army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	viii.viii
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	eight.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	one,206	61	5.i

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-charge per unit separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I inquire, if the excessive minor-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Imperial Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? Information technology would afford an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would take soared with a corresponding event—but on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Modest-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	iii,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	vii,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	five.34	£two,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.x	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Dr.

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to apply the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an try to provide protection confronting contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Nigh nowadays the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple land doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and pop book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this archetype tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old male child named James Phipps to examination his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'due south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, only nothing more than. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should take resulted in a full-blown, admitting mild, instance of the disease. Cypher happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more than; once again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner'south idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, merely eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the globe would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non different the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[ii]

Only legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western earth by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with noesis of the exercise of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a thing of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do meliorate against the disease than if they contracted information technology at some possibly less desirable fourth dimension and identify in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Just because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could just be afforded by the wealthy.[iii] The procedure did oftentimes help protect the private that was inoculated, merely there was still an estimated 2-five% that died as a result.[4,5] However, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[half-dozen] But, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to practise with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was one major and more often than not unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious affliction and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to end the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation patently tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a centre where the disease should happen in a natural style; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[7]

Even so, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative process it was enthusiastically continued past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease affair that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox as a test to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with just rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist immune to smallpox, at that place were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Doctor-Convivial Order, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Just he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where minor-pox had followed moo-cow-pox . . . [8]

From the first there were problems with Jenner'south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the written report simply decided to ignore the results considering they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with pocket-size-pox matter without effect, and a few months later took confluent minor-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Take chances, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years later on she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-scale-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted minor-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-sized-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's function . . . died of small-pox a yr afterwards vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-scale-pox later on vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is essentially the aforementioned fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality charge per unit along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Modest Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the nearly skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Dark-brown, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no i in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine do." But after vaccinating one,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, afterwards vaccination, people all the same could contract and even dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[13]

Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, i, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a swell hubbub near the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had pocket-sized-pox earlier, and often severely; virtually to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, just cruel upon peachy numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this fourth dimension vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that fabric was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased in that location was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authorization, and in that location were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[sixteen]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner really believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was only smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[eighteen] This faulty conventionalities would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[xix] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were also reports of deaths from other causes soon after vaccination. For example, a skin status called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "minor-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of four months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was beingness used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the University at Paris.

Get-go I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more than, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Equally it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more than doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In gild to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zilch to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the swell 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more than people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

Past this betoken, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were fabricated that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were existence made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the forcefulness of police created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, take been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has e'er a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Even so, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A nifty pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three thousand four hundred and sixty-nine cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July fifteen, 1871 said:

Of nine yard 3 hundred and xc-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six m eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more one hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from pocket-size-pox . . . Official returns from Germany prove that between 1870 and 1885 one 1000000 vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine move. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the swell sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Yet, in that location were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would consequence in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to command smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph ii). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an center-opener to the people and an middle-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Here is a neat manufacturing town having a population of virtually a quarter of a one thousand thousand, which has demonstrated past a crucial test of an feel extending over a catamenia of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-size-pox and far less affected by that affliction since it abased vaccination than information technology was at a time when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted as a safe procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph iv).

Graph two: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph three: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. Subsequently the summer of 1897, the astringent type of smallpox with its high death charge per unit, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in v of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from ane in 50 and later to as depression as 1 in 380. The disease could still kill, but having become so much milder, it was often mistaken for diverse other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the Southward and later gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and information technology [smallpox] was usually at get-go mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The writer of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease rate was around 20%, as it had been historically. The table besides showed that after 1896 the death rate brutal off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to every bit low as 0.26% by 1908. Every bit the mild form of smallpox replaced the archetype type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a modest communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly of import because information technology frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of balmy smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the manner of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination connected from the fourth dimension of the last smallpox death in the Us in 1948 upwards until 1963. This resulted in an estimated v,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, at present existence termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist between i in xx,000 to one in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to xl%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and there was no accurate bookkeeping on this result of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had simply been one smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox decease in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is notwithstanding occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his war machine male parent after the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged access, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required handling and virus was plant all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really take been even college. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United states. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern health-care system, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are aback to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if nosotros did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the full general public is non curious plenty to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination equally virtually the only medically promoted way to deal with disease, at that place were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food production that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. M. Oliphant, G.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the use of Acetic acid in cerise fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" equally practical to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in small-scale-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for 14 days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the safety handling died, while amongst those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[xl]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar'south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the thought of vinegar every bit a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used 3 or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Lodge, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the cracking men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed demand accept no fearfulness of smallpox if he will have two or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem featherbrained, but only because most people have been conditioned to have the age-one-time prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected fauna'south (unremarkably a cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the homo arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and haemorrhage. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, basic, and blood vessels and also gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is non able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, equally a issue, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Rex's College, described the poor nutrition of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California dominicus. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the golden miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of stiff coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the nearly intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice equally many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For case, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at least 2-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the adjacent common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for merely a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died every bit a result of their wounds accounted only for ane percent of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such every bit blood-red fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive pass up of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine religion. But the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand proper name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche every bit something to protect someone from an disease. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is zippo shut to the myth.

Other extremely constructive alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple tree cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective retention. Instead nosotros were left with the mythical history of Jenner's bang-up discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, practise more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to yous?

More data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be institute in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's volume "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Scientific discipline the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Illness and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
half dozen.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Do of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Instance Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
ix.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
eleven."Vaccination past Human action of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Periodical and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brownish, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. 2, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Dr., "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. four, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. CIV, no. 6, Feb 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. Westward. Harman, MD, "A Medico'southward Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. ane, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr 16, 1885, p. 380.
xxx.J. W. Hodge, Medico, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. West. Hodge, MD, "How Pocket-size-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Iii, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the The states," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. thirteen, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the exercise of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos Doc, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Pull a fast one on, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acrid in Carmine Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. one, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. Half dozen, no. one, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

jonesmosed1948.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post